EEOC Brings Discriminatory Failure To Promote Lawsuit Against Florida Harley-Davidson Dealerships
In a press release issued on August 20, 2018, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it has filed a sex discrimination lawsuit against four Harley-Davidson dealerships in Florida: Cigar Store Motors, Inc., d/b/a Harley-Davidson of Tampa; Tallahassee CCM, LLC, d/b/a Harley-Davidson of Tallahassee; Gulf Coast CCM, Inc., d/b/a Harley-Davidson of New Port Richey; and Panama Beach City Cycles, LLC, d/b/a Harley-Davidson of Panama Beach City (collectively CCM Companies). On August 20, 2018, the EEOC filed the lawsuit, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cigar Store Motors, Inc., Tallahassee CCM, LLC, Gulf Coast CCM, Inc., and Panama Beach City Cycles, LLC, Case No. 8:18-cv-02055, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida after initially attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its statutorily mandated conciliation process.
The EEOC has brought the sex discrimination lawsuit pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) on behalf of a former employee of CCM Companies, Virginia Duncan (Duncan). Under Title VII, it is an unlawful employment practice for employers to fail to promote employees on the basis of sex. The EEOC claims that CCM Companies violated Title VII by failing to promote Duncan to the position of general manager because of her sex. In this article, our Alachua County, Florida EEO attorneys explain the EEOC’s allegations CCM Companies.
EEOC Alleges Discriminatory Failure To Promote
CCM Companies own and operate several Harley-Davidson stores throughout Florida. From March 2012 until June 2015, Duncan worked for CCM Companies as a Sales Manager. When her employment ended in June 2015, Duncan was working as the General Sales Manager of the Tampa Harley-Davidson dealership owned by CCM Companies.
Throughout her employment with CCM, Duncan expressed an interest to upper management of CCM Companies in being promoted to a general manager position. Having had previous experience as a general manager at a Harley-Davidson dealership, Duncan was qualified for a general manager position. Although there was no formal application process for promotion to a general manager position with CCM Companies, Duncan was informed that she had to participate in a mentorship program conducted by CCM Companies’ Vice-President in order to advance to a general manager position. In May 2013, Duncan began participating in the mentorship program.
Employee Passed Over For Promotion
Between March 2012 and January 2015, according to the EEOC, there were nine vacancies for the general manager position at CCM Companies’ Harley-Davidson dealerships. CCM Companies hired a male for each available position. The EEOC contends that Duncan was qualified, or more qualified, than each of the males that were selected for the general manager position. On at least two occasions, Duncan was recommended as the best qualified candidate for promotion by the departing General Managers. The EEOC maintains that none of the male employees who were promoted to general manager were told that they were required to participate in the mentorship program prior to promotion.
In January 2015, there was a general manager opening at the Tampa Harley-Davidson dealership where Duncan was employed. CCM Companies temporarily filled the role with its Executive Manager in an acting capacity. Duncan was not interviewed for the general manager position. Instead, in April 2016, CCM Companies promoted a male to the position. The EEOC alleges that Duncan was more qualified than the male employee for the position. Unlike Duncan, the male employee did not have prior general manager experience and had not participated in the mentorship program.
The same day that she was denied promotion, Duncan asked the Executive Manager of CCM Companies whether the reason for her non-promotion was because of her sex. When the Executive Manager was unable to provide an answer to Duncan’s satisfaction, according to the EEOC, Duncan immediately began her search for other employment and the following day resigned her position at CCM Companies.
Protection Against Discriminatory Failure To Promote
The EEOC is the administrative agency of the United States responsible for interpreting and enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination, including sex discrimination. In enforcing the federal civil rights laws, the EEOC is also authorized by federal law to bring lawsuits on behalf of victims of sex discrimination, including employees unlawfully denied promotion because of their gender. In a press release issued by the EEOC on August 20, 2018 regarding the case, a Regional Attorney for the EEOC’s Miami District Office, Robert E. Weisburg, stated that “the law is clear—employers cannot discriminate on the basis of sex and they must provide a level playing field for all employees to compete for management positions.” In commenting on the case, the Director of the EEOC’s Tampa Field Office, Evangeline Hawthorne, explained that the “EEOC has long fought to protect women from hitting the glass ceiling in all professions and from outdated stereotypes about women in leadership which continue to persist.”
Free Consultation With Gainesville EEO Lawyers
Based in Ocala, Florida and representing employees throughout Central Florida, our Alachua County, Florida EEO attorneys have been fighting for the victims of employment discrimination for almost two decades. If you have subjected to discrimination at work or have questions about your rights under the federal anti-discrimination laws, please contact our office for a free consultation with out Alachua County, Florida EEO lawyers. Our employment and labor law attorneys take employment discrimination cases on a contingency fee basis. This means that there are no attorney’s fees incurred unless there is a recovery and our attorney’s fees come solely from the monetary award that you recover.