1111 NE 25th Ave., Suite 501
Ocala, Florida 34470
James P. Tarquin, P.A Call for a FREE Consultation!352-401-7671
Employment Law Blog
James Tarquin, P.A
As part of our commitment to assist and educate employees in fighting back against the abusive employment practices of employers, we offer a broad range of information about employment law issues in our employment blog

Florida & Federal Law Prohibit Discrimination or Harassment On The Basis Of Sex Stereotypes

Employment law

Florida and federal law prohibit an employer from discriminating against an employee because of the employee’s sex. The prohibition of discrimination because of sex also prohibits an employer from discriminating against an employee on the basis of sex stereotypes.

In 1989, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins that federal law does not permit a female employee to be discriminated against because her dress, appearance, or conduct does not conform to stereotypical ideas of femininity. In that case, the plaintiff, a female senior manager in an accounting firm, was denied partnership in the firm because, in part, she was considered “macho” and “a tough talking somewhat masculine hard-nosed manager.” She was informed that she could improve her chances for partnership if she were to take “a course at charm school,” “walk more femininely, talk more femininely, dress more femininely, wear make-up, have her hair styled, and wear jewelry.” A plurality of the Supreme Court concluded that such remarks manifested sex discrimination and found that federal law not only prohibits discrimination based on the fact that the employee was a woman, but also discrimination based on the fact that she failed “to act like a woman” and conform to stereotyped expectations of femininity. Thus, the Supreme Court determined that the plaintiff had an actionable claim under federal law because she was denied partnership for failure to conform to sex stereotypes regarding how a woman should look and behave.

The Supreme Court’s holding in Price Waterhouse applies equally to a man who is discriminated against for acting too feminine. Courts have determined that just as a woman can base a sex discrimination lawsuit on a claim that men discriminated against her because she did not meet stereotyped expectations of femininity, a man can base a sex discrimination lawsuit on a claim that other men discriminated against him because he did not meet stereotyped expectations of masculinity.

We have extensive experience representing employees who have been discriminated against for failure to conform to sex stereotypes. If you have been subjected to sex discrimination or have any questions regarding sex discrimination in the workplace, please contact our office for a free consultation.

Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2015 - 2018 James P. Tarquin, P.A. All rights reserved.
This Custom WebShop™ attorney website is designed
by NextClient.com.

Contact Form Tab Close Menu