Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
333 N.W. 3rd Avenue
Ocala, Florida 34475
James P. Tarquin, P.A Call for a FREE Consultation!352-401-7671
Employment Law Blog
James Tarquin, P.A
As part of our commitment to assist and educate employees in fighting back against the abusive employment practices of employers, we offer a broad range of information about employment law issues in our employment blog.

Male Employee Told Deal With Sexual Harassment From Female Employee By Putting On His “Big Boy Pants”

The female boss harassing the male employee

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) makes sexual harassment which is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment and create an abusive work environment unlawful. Having represented sexual harassment victims for almost twenty years, our Central Florida hostile work environment harassment attorneys have learned that employers frequently do not take complaints from men about sexually harassing behavior from women in the workplace seriously. In minimizing, if not ridiculing, complaints from male employees, employers often fail to take remedial action to prevent women from sexually harassing men. The decision by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in Oberdorf v. Penn Village Facility Operations, LLC, No. 15-1880 (M.D. Penn. March 3, 2017) illustrates that employers are obligated to protect men from sexually harassing behavior from women at work and cannot retaliate against men who make sexual harassment complaints against women.

Male Employee Told To “Suck It Up”

In that case, Ralph Oberdorf (Oberdorf) claimed that his former employers, Penny Village Facility Operations, LLC and Consulate Management Company (collectively Defendants), fired him in retaliation for complaining about sexual harassment. Oberdorf was employed by the Defendants as a licensed practical nurse. The facility where Oberdorf worked was a predominately female-staffed nursing facility. Oberdorf alleged that he was subjected to discriminatory harassment on the basis of gender by his female supervisor. The alleged sex-based harassing behavior towards Oberdorf included remarks that he must be gay because he is a male nurse, comments about his buttocks, and remarks about his girlfriend giving him lap dances. Oberdorf asserted that the supervisor’s comments were made repeatedly over the course of a year.

Oberdorf alleged that he complained multiple times to management about the discriminatory harassment. Despite his repeated complaints, according to Oberdorf, management failed to investigate or correct the discriminatory harassment. Instead, Oberdorf claimed, the Administrator of the facility where he worked told him to “suck it up” and “put on your big boy pants.” Oberdorf was fired about one week after his last complaint of sex-based discriminatory harassment. As justification for the discharge, the Defendants gave Oberdorf a vague explanation about an alleged altercation he had with a patient. In support of his retaliation claim, Oberdorf alleged that although female nurse failed to give the patient medication, she was not fired for this conduct. 

Comments Reflect A Pattern Of Antagonism

The Defendants filed a motion with the trial court seeking dismissal of Oberdorf’s retaliation claim. In doing so, the Defendants asked the trial court to find that Oberdorf’s retaliation claim failed as a matter of law. In denying the Defendants’ motion for dismissal, the trial court observed that Oberdorf alleged that he was fired approximately one week after his final complaint of sex-based discriminatory harassment. The “very close” timing between Oberdorf’s final discrimination complaint and termination, the trial court explained, was “unduly suggestive” of retaliation. The trial court also found that the Administrator’s comments to Oberdorf that he needs to “suck it up” and “put on your big boy pants” reflected a “pattern of antagonism” against Oberdorf for complaining about the discriminatory harassment. This evidence, the trial court concluded, was sufficient to establish a plausible claim for retaliation.

Free Consultation With Ocala Hostile Work Environment Lawyers

Based in Ocala, Florida and representing employees throughout Central Florida, we have substantial experience litigating cases on behalf of victims of hostile work environment harassment. If you have been the victim of workplace harassment or have questions about being fired in retaliation for complaining about workplace harassment, please contact our office for a free consultation with our Central Florida hostile work environment harassment attorneys. Our employee rights law firm takes hostile work environment harassment cases on a contingency fee basis. This means that there are no attorney’s fees incurred unless there is a recovery and our attorney’s fees come solely from the monetary award that you recover. 

Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2015 - 2024 James P. Tarquin, P.A. All rights reserved.
This Custom WebShop™ attorney website is designed
by NextClient.com.

Contact Form Tab Close Menu